Madness is the exception in individuals but the rule in groups. — Friedrich Nietszche


Jonathan did not talk about Tibet, but about his own search for meaning and what the Buddhist concepts meant to him in his American life. I fell in love with Jonathan. I liked the way he talked, the little half smile on his sculpted face. I liked looking at his pretty wife, Ellen. I went to their apartment, on a tiny tree-lined lane off Rittenhouse Square, got drunk and watched our thoughts fly around the room.
The year after I met him, Jonathan went off to a Buddhist seminary. I stayed on, meditated and tried to make meaningful contact with the other Buddhists. This did not go well. Many of them of them spoke to me as if from behind a stone wall. I wanted to know what they cared about besides Buddhism. Either they kept all that secret, or else the rest of their lives was an accident. It was a shelf of empty vessels, people without a thought in their heads, and they found Buddhism because it happened along. They could just as easily have followed Joseph Smith or Jerry Garcia. They were obsessed with Chogyam Trungpa and the Wisdom of Tibet. Every scrap of information about the teacher was treasured like a diamond. If he drank tequila, they drank tequila. If he liked David Bowie, they ran out and bought all of Bowie's records. I often wondered what they did with their lives before their lama arrived.

I was still trying to judge whether to continue when Trungpa Himself came to town. I put my best blue shirt on and rode my bike down Sansom Street, locking it to a light pole. We sat in the shrine room and waited for the divine presence. New people were standing by all the doors, men with scary expressions on their faces.

During the question period, I asked, "How do you reconcile those ideas you spoke of, traveling a path, but also finding your ground, staying grounded?"
CT: "Every step you take, when your foot touches ground, then you are stationary. So in this way, you travel while staying grounded."
After the talk, we all got in line to greet the great teacher. I was excited by the prospect, though I had no idea what I'd say to him. While standing in line, I got a little nervous, listening to the others as they looked for divinity in his every gesture. When he held a little child on his lap, a man whispered in my ear, "When he touches that child, something happens!" Um, yeah.
Before I reached him, Trungpa got tired and moved slowly out of the room, with the help of the creepy door guys. All eyes were on him and the silence was oppressive. He turned around with effort and said, "Cheer up." Another pearl of wisdom.
If you want your own Trungpa experience, you can get a sample here and here.

The elaborate housing of Trungpa’s skull demonstrates his followers’ continuing devotion. They referred to him as “venerable” while he was still alive. Ever after, they confound themselves, adding new honorary titles. Nothing in Trungpa’s life or teachings justifies this adulation, in any way. At best, Chogyam Trungpa and Thomas Rich were skillful opportunists. They destroyed themselves and damaged many people around them. But many of these victims continue to venerate them today, and they rewrite history in favor of the dead.
If you read more than two biographies of cult leaders, you will notice they use exactly the same tactics to attract and manipulate their followers. Faulk’s book is a good example. Tactically, Yogananda is L. Ron Hubbard is Maharishi is Thomas Rich. Next door, Reverend Moon is Jim Jones is David Koresh is Michael Travesser. And these are only a few recent examples of the game, played successfully since ancient times. The monotony is shocking.


To set the record straight: I was bamboozled, I was taken. My involvement with Tibetan Buddhism was largely a waste of time, an extremely un-clever choice.
Each of us contains dangerous forces. One is the will to power over others, and another is our desire to be protected by an elevated hero. When these two forces collide, reason flies out the window. And it's no good waiting around for reason to return; it won't.